FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Mohammad [2000] FCA 1275
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS v ELIAS KANCHAN MOHAMMAD
N 435 of 2000
BURCHETT, BRANSON & MARSHALL JJ
SYDNEY
18 SEPTEMBER 2000
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
N 435 of 2000 |
|
BETWEEN: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS APPELLANT
|
|
AND: |
RESPONDENT
|
|
JUDGES: |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE: |
CORRIGENDUM
BRANSON J
In the Reasons for Judgment published by Justice Branson on 18 September 2000 paragraph 10 should read:
“No criticism can be made of the decision of the Tribunal to include the invitation to the applicant to appear before it and the notice of the date on which, and the time and place at which, he was scheduled to appear in the one document. Indeed, as the Act does not expressly provide for the method by which an invitation under s 425(1) is to be given to an applicant (although by contrast, it does provide for the method by which invitations under ss 424 and 424A are to be given to the applicants), it would seem that the legislature intended the notification of the invitation required to be contained in the notice under s 425A (see s 426(1)(a)) to itself constitute the invitation to the applicant.”
Associate:
Dated: 18 September 2000
