FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [No 2] [2000] FCA 1010

Matter No. SG 33 of 1997

THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN & WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN & BINALONG PTY LTD v LUMINIS PTY LTD, DEANE JOANNE FERGIE, CHERYL ANNE SAUNDERS, ROBERT EDWARD TICKNER & COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

von DOUSSA J

4 AUGUST 2000

ADELAIDE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY	SG 33 OF 1997

BETWEEN:

THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN and WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN and BINALONG PTY LTD (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation)

APPLICANT

AND:

LUMINIS PTY LTD

FIRST RESPONDENT

DEANE JOANNE FERGIE

SECOND RESPONDENT

CHERYL ANNE SAUNDERS

THIRD RESPONDENT

ROBERT EDWARD TICKNER

FOURTH RESPONDENT

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

FIFTH RESPONDENT

JUDGE:	von DOUSSA J
DATE:	4 AUGUST 2000
PLACE:	ADELAIDE

CORRIGENDUM

Please note the following changes in the reasons for evidence ruling published 28 July 2000.

1. Add to page 2 of the Orders the following:

“5. Liberty to apply.”

2. Paragraph 58, page 25 – replace the sentence beginning “It is a further requirement of the law…” with “It is a further requirement of the law that before the Minister makes a declaration that will adversely affect interests of the State or Territory in which the area is located, and property interests of individuals, the holders of those interests are to be accorded procedural fairness.”

Associate:

Dated:

Top