FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

“Y” v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 703


“Y” v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

 

VG 367 OF 1998

 

NORTH J

29 MAY 2000

MELBOURNE




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VG 367 OF 1998

 

BETWEEN:

“Y”

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE OF ORDER:

29 MAY 2000

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.                  The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal is set aside.


2.                  The application is referred to the Refugee Review Tribunal for determination.


3.         The Minister is to pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to this application.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

 


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VG 367 OF 1998

 

BETWEEN:

“Y”

APPLICANT

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

 

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

29 MAY 2000

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT


1                     This is an application by a young male Kenyan, referred to as “Y”, for review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) made on 17 July 1998 to affirm the decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, the respondent, to refuse the applicant a protection visa.  The applicant came to Australia with his friend “X”.  The circumstances relevant to his application are the same as the circumstances relevant to the application brought by “X” challenging the refusal of a grant of a protection visa to him.  Both cases were heard by the Court at the same time and the same arguments were raised in respect of both “X” and “Y”.  For the reasons set out in the judgment relating to “X” handed down together with this judgment, the decision of the Tribunal relating to “Y” should be set aside, the application referred to the Tribunal for determination, and the respondent is to pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to this application.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North.


Associate:

 

Dated:              29 May 2000

 

 

 

Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr R M Niall

Mr P Gray

 

 

Solicitor for the Applicant:

Erskine Rodan & Associates

 

 

Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr R R Tracey QC

Mr N Green

 

 

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor

 

 

Date of Hearing:

15 - 16 November 1999

 

 

Date of Judgment:

29 May 2000