FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Rajamanikkam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[1999] FCA 1411

NADARASA RAJAMANIKKAM & BALAMBIKAI RAJAMANIKKAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

NG 1133 OF 1998

EINFELD J

19 NOVEMBER 1999

SYDNEY

CORRIGENDUM

In the above judgment handed down in Sydney on 19 November 1999 by Justice Einfeld, please note the following amendments:

·               on the cover page in the list of authorities, in the sixth line replace the word “Thevendram” with the word “Thevandram”;

·               on the cover page in the list of authorities, add the line “Australian Telecommunications Commission v Barker” [1990] 12 AAR 490 applied;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 13, para 20, in the line commencing with the words “obtaining money” – delete the word “matters” and substitute the word “controversies”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 13, para 20, in the line commencing with the words “decision under” –  after the word “was” add the words “in my opinion”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 14, para 24, in the line commencing with the words “rejection of” – delete the word “evidence:” and substitute the words “evidence.  I deal with them in the order adopted by the Tribunal:”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 21, para 34, in the line commencing with the word “Trincomalee” – delete the word “is” and substitute the word “are”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 25, para 41, in the line commencing with the words “also hardly” – after the word “intimidation” add the words “in anonymity”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 25, para 41, in the line commencing with the words “operation employed” – after the words “civil wars” insert the words “where retribution may be swift and fatal.”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 28, para 50, in the line commencing with the words “the applicant” – delete the word “his” and substitute the word “the”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 34, para 68, in the line commencing with the words “not reject” – delete the word “practice” and substitute the word “practise”;

·               in the Reasons for Judgment, page 35, para 70, in the line commencing with the words “may have been” – after the word “identified” add “,”;

Associate:

Dated:              22 November 1999