FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Worrell v Tantner-Issitch [1999] FCA 1297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGFRIED TANTNER  EX PARTE: IVOR WORRELL v LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH

 

 

 

 

DOWSETT J

14 SEPTEMBER 1999

BRISBANE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QG 7007 OF 1996

 

BETWEEN:

SIGFRIED TANTNER

Bankrupt

 

EX PARTE:  IVOR WORRELL

Applicant

 

AND:

LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH

Respondent

 

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

14 SEPTEMBER 1999

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QG 7007 OF 1996

 

BETWEEN:

SIGFRIED TANTNER

Bankrupt

 

EX PARTE:  IVOR WORRELL

Applicant

 

AND:

LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH

Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE:

14 SEPTEMBER 1999

PLACE:

BRISBANE



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT


1                     I would not normally entertain an application for interrogatories at this late stage, but these are proceedings in bankruptcy, and it does seem to me that they have been conducted in a quite singular way on both sides.  I am of the view that the conduct of the trial is likely to be very much expedited if the interrogatories are answered.  In those circumstances I think that it is probably in the interests of the administration of justice that they be answered.



I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.


Associate:


Dated:              15 September 1999



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr M Martin



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Baker Johnson



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr P McQuade



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Andrew P Abaza



Date of Hearing:

14 September 1999



Date of Judgment:

14 September 1999