FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 

Zhang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 887


GUO RONG ZHANG V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

 

NG 1156 OF 1998

 

 

Burchett J

10 June 1999

Sydney


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NG 1156 of 1998

 

BETWEEN:

GUO RONG ZHANG

Applicant

 

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Respondent

 

 

JUDGE:

BURCHETT J

DATE:

10 JUNE 1999

PLACE:

SYDNEY


EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     This is an application to review a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal.  I have read and considered that decision.  Mr Zhang has not appeared today, notwithstanding evidence put before me which shows quite clearly that, not only was the solicitor who was originally acting for him notified of today's hearing date, but because that solicitor had indicated some difficulty in communication with his client, and a desire to withdraw from the case, at least two letters were sent directly to Mr Zhang by the solicitor handling the matter at the Australian Government Solicitor's office.  At least one letter, giving adequate notice, was sent, as is shown by the affidavit verifying the sending of it, in the appropriate manner to obtain an advice receipt and delivery confirmation from Australia Post.  These bear a signature purporting to be the signature of Mr Zhang, which I have compared with two signatures of his contained in the relevant documents.  I am quite satisfied that Mr Zhang in fact received the letter, the signature being his signature.

 

2                     There is authority that summary orders should not be made without some consideration of the case, and I have, as I have said, read and considered the reasons of the Tribunal in this case.  I can myself find no indication of any error of law; and none has been submitted to me.  As there has been no appearance, I now dismiss the application with costs.

 

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Burchett.

 

 

Associate:

 

Dated:              10 June 1999

 

 

Applicant:

No appearance for the applicant

 

Counsel for the Respondent:

Ms S McNaughton

 

 

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor

 

 

Date of Hearing:

10 June 1999

 

 

Date of Judgment:

10 June 1999