FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Merchant v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 49
MERCHANT v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
WG 121 OF 1995
R D NICHOLSON J
5 FEBRUARY 1999
PERTH
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
) |
|
|
) |
|
) WG 121 of 1995 |
|
|
|
) |
|
GENERAL DIVISION |
) |
|
BETWEEN: |
Applicant
|
|
AND: |
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
|
|
JUDGE(S): |
|
|
DATE: |
|
|
PLACE |
|
|
|
|
CORRIGENDA
Reasons for Judgment
At paragraph 1, sentence 2 “1997” should read “1987”.
At paragraph 33, in the quote from Brennan J in Inglis, 2nd last sentence, the word “not” should be between “asset” and “employed”.
At paragraph 42, “Belmont of Fertile” should be “Belmont to Fertile”.
At paragraph 50, “assessable income is not shown” should be “assessable income is shown”
At paragraph 64 “Act 1062” should be “Act 1928”.
At paragraph 83 “Exh 3 (AWV1)” should be “Exh 3 (AVW1)” and “Exh 3 (AWV2)” should be “Exh 3 (AVW2)”.
At paragraph 92, the last word “significance” should be “significant”.
At paragraph 101, “to Belmont” should be “by Belmont”.
Various
Any spelling of “referrable” should be “referable”
Tanya Davies
Associate to Justice R D Nicholson
12 September 1999
