REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

There are before the Court two notices of motion.  One dated 13 February 1997 by the second respondent and one dated 14 August 1998 by the third respondent, the Australian Electoral Commission.  They seek orders that the petition be dismissed.  The petition itself was filed on 22 November 1996, that is getting on for two years ago.  It concerns the election held on 12 October 1996 for the Hobart Ward of the Tasmanian Regional Council of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.

I think it is self-evident that an important matter such as this has to be prosecuted through the courts with reasonable diligence.  The applicant does not appear today.  He telephoned the District Registrar yesterday.  The following is a copy of the note of that conversation taken by the District Registrar.  “He”, that is the applicant,

“...advises that he will not be attending Court tomorrow due to his medical condition.  I asked him whether he had any new material medical or otherwise that he wanted the Court to take note of and he referred to the medical reports on file. 

I warned him that depending on what application is made to the Court the Court may dismiss his application in his absence.  He indicated his displeasure about the prospect of this happening in his absence.”

I infer in all the circumstances that the applicant has not taken reasonable steps to prosecute this matter and there is no reasonable prospect of him doing so in the future.  Accordingly the petition will be dismissed.                                   

Associate:

Dated:              25 August 1998