IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	NG 721 of 1995

BETWEEN:	HANAVE PTY LIMITED Applicant
AND:	LFOT PTY LIMITED (formerly JAGAR PTY LIMITED) First Respondent/CROSS CLAIMANT PAUL EWEN MITCHELL TRESSIDER Second Respondent/CROSS CLAIMANT JOSEPH RAYMOND GLEW Third Respondent/CROSS CLAIMANT ROBERT BURKE CROSS Respondent
JUDGE:		MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:		31 AUGUST 1998
WHERE MADE:		SYDNEY

CORRIGENDUM

In the reasons for decision of Moore J dated 31 August 1998, the appearances on page 59 should read:

Counsel for the Applicant:	Mr G McVay

Solicitor for the Applicant:	Gilbert Mane

Counsel for the Respondents:	Mr C Hodgekiss Ms Dominique Hogan-Doran Ms Penny Wines Mr Mark Richmond

Solicitor for the Respondents:	Hunt & Hunt Lawyers

Counsel for Cross-Respondent:	Mr G McVay

Solicitor for Cross-Respondent:	Diana Perla & Associates

Dates of Hearing:	7-9 & 14-15 April 1997, 15-26 September 1997, 21, 23-24, 27 & 29 October 1997, 22 December 1997

Associate: Date: 31 August 1998

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	NG 721 of 1995

BETWEEN:	HANAVE PTY LIMITED Applicant
AND:	LFOT PTY LIMITED (formerly JAGAR PTY LIMITED) First Respondent/CROSS CLAIMANT PAUL EWEN MITCHELL TRESIDDER Second Respondent/CROSS CLAIMANT JOSEPH RAYMOND GLEW Third Respondent/CROSS CLAIMANT ROBERT BURKE CROSS Respondent
JUDGE:		MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:		31 AUGUST 1998
WHERE MADE:		SYDNEY

CORRIGENDUM

1. In the reasons for decision of Moore J dated 31 August 1998, the word “Slatyer” in the fourth sentence of the second paragraph of page 24 should be replaced with the word “Tresidder” and should read:

“It is also relatively clear that both Tresidder and Glew were prepared to accede to Slatyer’s demand in order to pacify him …”

2. The word “Tressider”, at all other points in the judgment, should read “Tresidder”.

Associate:

Date: 16 September 1998

Top