CORRIGENDUM

In the reasons for judgment delivered by Justice Moore on 30 October 1997 please amend:

(1)          Page 4, paragraph commencing (v) should read:

              (v)    Whether this Court has jurisdiction...

(2)          Page 10, third paragraph, sentence commencing "It also deals with" should read:

              It also deals with such matters as prosecutions for breaching certified agreements and the         review of certified agreements by the Commission if their contents are discriminatory.

(3)          Page 12, fourth paragraph, first sentence, should read:

              The CFMEU appeared to contend that a decision has been made to retrench employees and that decision was based on what I have just said about the profits to be earned by the Company.

(4)          Page 18, first paragraph, the sentence commencing "The clause in question in the present case" should read:

              The clause in question in the present case is, effectively, a prohibition on the engagement of independent contractors in the sense that existing contracts must be terminated and not renewed.

(5)          Page 18, first paragraph. the sentence commencing "Nonetheless, for the reasons I have just discussed" should read:

              Nonetheless, for the reasons I have just discussed, cl 37(b) could not have been certified under s 170MC.

(6)          Page 22, third paragraph, after "see Victoria v Australian Teachers Union, and" remove the word "is".

Associate:

Date:    5 November 1997