CORRIGENDA

Please amend the aforementioned judgment as follows:

(1)  On the Catchwords page in the legislative references, the words “Dairy Industry Authority Act 1973 (WA)” should be amended to read “Dairy Industry Act 1973 (WA)”.

(2)  On the Catchwords page in the legislative references, the words “Trade Practices Act, s52” should be amended to read “Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52”.

(3)  On page 1 of the reasons for judgment add the following words at the beginning of line 1:

“HIS HONOUR:”.

(4)  On page 2 of the reasons for judgment at line 1 remove the words “(“the respondent”)”.

(5)  The words “Ernst and Young” should be amended to read “Ernst & Young” in each place they appear in the reasons for judgment.

(6)  On page 2 of the reasons for judgment at line 14, the words “Dairy Industry Authority Act 1973 (WA) (“the DIAA”).” should be amended to read “Dairy Industry Act 1973 (WA) (“the DI Act”).”.

(7)  The word “DIAA” should be amended to read “DI Act” in each place it appears in the reasons for judgment, except at page 39 (see (15) below).

(8)  On page 4 of the reasons for judgment at line 2, the word “authority” should be amended to read “Authority”.

(9)  On page 15 of the reasons for judgment, 11 lines from the bottom, the words “Dairy Industry Amendment Act” should be amended to read “Dairy Industry Amendment Act 1994 (WA) (“the DIA Act”)”.

(10)  On page 16 of the reasons for judgment, 10 lines from the top the words “Dairy Industry Amendment Act 1994 (WA)” should be amended to read “the DIA Act”.

(11)  The word “applicant’s” should be amended to read “applicants’ ” in each place it appears in the reasons for judgment.

(12)  On page 25 of the reasons for judgment at line 2, the word “address” should be amended to read “addressed”.

(13)  On page 28 of the reasons for judgment at line 1 add the word “the” before the words “Schryver statement”.

(14)  On page 28 of the reasons for judgment, 2 lines from the bottom, the word “applicants” should be amended to read “applicants’ ”.

(15)  On page 39 of the reasons for judgment, 7 lines from the bottom, the word “DIAA”

should be amended to read “Authority”.

(16)  On page 43 of the reasons for judgment, 8 lines from the bottom, the words “real after tax of 5 per cent...” should be amended to read “real after tax rate of 5 per cent...”.

(17)  On page 44 of the reasons for judgment at line 7, the word “Browne’s” should be amended to read “Brownes’ ”.

(18)  On page 44 of the reasons for judgment at line 9, the word “Brown’s” should be amended to read “Brownes’ ”.

(19)  On page 45 of the reasons for judgment at line 9, the word “mislead” should be amended to read “misled”.

(20)  On page 45 of the reasons for judgment at line 15, the word “recognize” should be amended to read “recognise”.

Nicholas McGlew

Associate to the Honourable Justice R D Nicholson

12 December 1997