IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA)
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY) No NG 475 of 1994
GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN:
CHARLES DENNIS JAFFE
Applicant
AND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS
Respondent
CORAM: SACKVILLE J.
PLACE: SYDNEY
DATE: 14 November 1995
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
I have dealt in this matter with the applicant's application for adjournment. In dealing with that application I have set out the history of the matter. Once I refused the application for adjournment Mr Anstee, who had been appearing for the applicant only in relation to the adjournment application, sought to be excused. He had previously, as I have already indicated, stated to the court that he had been briefed only to appear on the adjournment application.
In those
circumstances, Ms Henderson, who appears for the Minister, seeks an order that
the proceedings be dismissed. She relies
upon Order 32, rule 2 of the Federal Court Rules. That rule provides that if, when a proceeding
is called on for trial, any party is absent the court may, if the party absent
is an applicant, dismiss the action. In
any event, as I follow Ms Henderson, she relies upon the fact that there
is nobody present for the applicant, and thus no submissions have been made or
evidence led on behalf of the applicant in connection with the application to
set aside the decision.
In those circumstances I think the appropriate course is for the application to be dismissed and I do so. I order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs.
I certify that this and the preceding 1 page are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Sackville.
Associate:
Dated: 14 November, 1995
Heard: 14 November, 1995
Place: Sydney
Decision: 14 November, 1995
Appearances: Mr M. Anstee, appeared for the applicant.
Ms R. Henderson, instructed by the Australian Government Solicitor, appeared for the respondent.