FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets v Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 131
Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets [2020] FCA 1493 | |
File numbers: | VID 732 of 2020 VID 737 of 2020 |
Judgment of: | ALLSOP CJ, BESANKO and MIDDLETON JJ |
Date of judgment: | |
Division: | General Division |
Registry: | Victoria |
National Practice Area: | Commercial and Corporations |
Sub-area: | Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance |
Number of paragraphs: | |
Date of last submissions: | 27 July 2021 |
10–11 May 2021 | |
Solicitor for the Appellant: | Lander & Rogers Lawyers |
Counsel for the First Respondent: | Mr J Slattery QC with Ms J Collins |
Solicitor for the First Respondent: | K & L Gates |
Counsel for the Second Respondent: | Mr S Donaldson SC with Ms N Oreb |
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: | Barry Nilsson Lawyers |
ORDERS
DATE OF ORDER: |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
(1) The cross-appeal be allowed.
(2) The appeal be dismissed.
(3) Orders 1 and 2 and declaration 6 made by the Court made on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019 be set aside and in lieu thereof:
(a) Declare that in November 2015 the applicant (Icon) invoked condition 15 of the Third Party Liability Policy numbered 438396 issued by the first respondent (Liberty), and Icon thereby obtained insurance cover from Liberty in terms of said condition 15 for the Opal Tower Contract and Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of said policy up to and including the end of any testing and/or defects liability and/or maintenance periods under the contracts which Icon entered into and under which Icon performed work in connection with the Opal Tower Contract and Project, and thereby up to and including at least 24 and 27 December 2018.
(b) Declare that the cracking observed on 24 and 27 December 2018 at the “Opal Tower” development at 98 Bennelong Parkway, Sydney reflected or was the result of an Occurrence in connection with the Insured’s, that is Icon’s, Business within the meaning of said policy numbered 438396 that occurred within the period of cover of the said 2015/2016 policy.
(4) Liberty pay Icon’s costs of the appeal and cross-appeal as agreed or assessed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
ORDERS
VID 737 of 2020 | ||
BETWEEN: | QBE UNDERWRITING LIMITED AS MANAGING AGENTS FOR UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATES 386 AND 299 Appellant | |
AND: | ICON CO (NSW) PTY LTD (ACN 604 790 409) First Respondent LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AUSTRALIAN BRANCH TRADING AS LIBERTY SPECIALTY MARKETS (ABN 61 086 083 605) Second Respondent
|
order made by: | ALLSOP CJ, BESANKO AND MIDDLETON JJ |
DATE OF ORDER: | 29 July 2021 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
(1) The appeal be allowed.
(2) Declaration 8 made on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019 be set aside by consent.
(3) Order 4 and declaration 7 made on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019 be set aside and in lieu thereof it be ordered that:
(a) the third further amended originating application by the applicant (Icon) as against the second respondent (QBE) be dismissed; and
(b) Icon pay QBE’s costs of the proceeding to be agreed or assessed.
(4) Icon pay QBE’s costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
THE COURT:
1 On 20 July 2021, the Court delivered its reasons in respect of these two appeals: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets v Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 126. The Court ordered that the parties within seven (7) days file any submissions as to the form of the orders set out at [351] of the reasons in respect of the Liberty appeal and [435] of the reasons in respect of the QBE appeal.
2 In respect of the Liberty appeal, the appellant submits that the Court ought not to have proposed order 4 at [351] in circumstances where it does not propose to set aside order 3 of the orders made in the primary proceedings on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019. Order 3 states that “Liberty pay Icon’s costs of the proceeding as agreed or taxed”. The proposed order 4 states that “Liberty pay Icon’s costs of the proceeding as agreed or assessed”. The Court agrees that in circumstances where order 3 is not set aside, proposed order 4, which is in substantially identical terms, is unnecessary and should not be made.
3 Also in respect of the Liberty appeal, the first respondent submits that the date proposed in order 3(a) of the proposed orders at [351] ought to have been November 2015, rather than December 2015. The Court agrees with that submission.
4 The parties in the QBE appeal submit that they do not oppose the form of orders proposed by the Court at [435]. The Court however notes that orders 8 and 7 referred to in the proposed orders (2) and (3) were in fact declarations and should be referred to as such.
5 The Court will therefore make the following orders.
6 In respect of the Liberty appeal, it be ordered that:
(1) The cross-appeal be allowed.
(2) The appeal be dismissed.
(3) Orders 1 and 2 and declaration 6 made by the Court made on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019 be set aside and in lieu thereof:
(a) Declare that in November 2015 the applicant (Icon) invoked condition 15 of the Third Party Liability Policy numbered 438396 issued by the first respondent (Liberty), and Icon thereby obtained insurance cover from Liberty in terms of said condition 15 for the Opal Tower Contract and Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of said policy up to and including the end of any testing and/or defects liability and/or maintenance periods under the contracts which Icon entered into and under which Icon performed work in connection with the Opal Tower Contract and Project, and thereby up to and including at least 24 and 27 December 2018.
(b) Declare that the cracking observed on 24 and 27 December 2018 at the “Opal Tower” development at 98 Bennelong Parkway, Sydney reflected or was the result of an Occurrence in connection with the Insured’s, that is Icon’s, Business within the meaning of said policy numbered 438396 that occurred within the period of cover of the said 2015/2016 policy.
(4) Liberty pay Icon’s costs of the appeal and cross-appeal as agreed or assessed.
7 In respect of the QBE appeal, it be ordered that:
(1) The appeal be allowed.
(2) Declaration 8 made on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019 be set aside by consent.
(3) Order 4 and declaration 7 made on 26 October 2020 in VID781/2019 be set aside and in lieu thereof it be ordered that:
(a) the third further amended originating application by the applicant (Icon) as against the second respondent (QBE) be dismissed; and
(b) Icon pay QBE’s costs of the proceeding to be agreed or assessed.
(4) Icon pay QBE’s costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed.
I certify that the preceding seven (7) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Chief Justice Allsop and Justices Besanko and Middleton. |