FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

Salfinger v Niugini Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 103



PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal – no appearance by appellant – appeal dismissed



Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2B)(bb)(ii)



 


 


 


 


RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER v NIUGINI MINING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 011 060 898) and STATE OF QUEENSLAND

 

VID 979 of 2007

 

 

 

FINKELSTEIN, JACOBSON AND GORDON JJ

5 MAY 2008

MELBOURNE




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 979 of 2007

 

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER

Appellant

 


AND:

NIUGINI MINING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD

(ACN 011 060 898)

First Respondent

 

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

Second Respondent

 

 

JUDGES:

FINKELSTEIN, JACOBSON AND GORDON JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

5 MAY 2008

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.         The appeal be dismissed.

2.         The appellant pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal, such costs to be taxed on an indemnity basis.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 979 of 2007

 

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER

Appellant

 


AND:

NIUGINI MINING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD

(ACN 011 060 898)

First Respondent

 

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

Second Respondent

 

 

JUDGES:

FINKELSTEIN, JACOBSON AND GORDON JJ

DATE:

5 MAY 2008

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

FINKELSTEIN J

1                      The appeal having been called on and there being no appearance by the appellant I would order that the appeal be dismissed with costs: see s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).  In virtue of the fact that the appeal seemed to me to be nigh on hopeless, I would order the costs to be paid on an indemnity basis.

           

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Finkelstein.


Associate:


Dated:         10 June 2008



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 979 of 2007

 

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER

Appellant

 


AND:

NIUGINI MINING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD

(ACN 011 060 898)

First Respondent

 

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

Second Respondent

 

 

JUDGES:

FINKELSTEIN, JACOBSON AND GORDON JJ

DATE:

5 MAY 2008

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

JACOBSON J

2                          I agree.


I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Jacobson.



Associate:


Dated:         10 June 2008




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 979 of 2007

 

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER

Appellant

 


AND:

NIUGINI MINING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 011 060 898)

First Respondent

 

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

Second Respondent

 

 

JUDGES:

FINKELSTEIN, JACOBSON AND GORDON JJ

DATE:

5 MAY 2008

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

GORDON J

3                          I agree.


I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Gordon.



Associate:


Dated:         10 June 2008


No appearance for the Appellant

 

 

 

Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr M T Brady

 

 

Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Blake Dawson

 

 

Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr G Gibson QC

Mr D O'Brien

 

 

Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Crown Law


Date of Hearing:

5 May 2008

 

 

Date of Judgment:

5 May 2008