FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

 The Republic of Finland v Tervonen [2008] FCAFC 25

 

 

 

 

 

THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND v JAN TERVONEN AND MAGISTRATE PAUL LYON

NSD 2525 OF 2007

 

JACOBSON, bennett & buchanan JJ

6 MARCH 2008

SYDNEY



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 2525 of 2007

 

ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND

Appellant

 

AND:

JAN TERVONEN

First Respondent

 

MAGISTRATE PAUL LYON

Second Respondent

 

 

JUDGES:

JACOBSON, bennett & buchanan JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

6 MARCH 2008

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

1.      The appeal be allowed.

2.      Orders 1, 2 and 3 made by Gyles J on 20 December 2007 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the matter be remitted to his Honour to be determined according to law.

3.      The first respondent be arrested pursuant to s 21(6)(e) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth).

4.      The first respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.

 

 


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 2525 of 2007

 

ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

BETWEEN:

THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND

Appellant

 

AND:

JAN TERVONEN

First Respondent

 

MAGISTRATE PAUL LYON

Second Respondent

 

 

 

JUDGES:

JACOBSON, bennett & buchanan JJ

DATE:

6 MARCH 2008

PLACE:

SYDNEY



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

            THE COURT:

1                     This is an appeal from orders made by Gyles J on 20 December 2007.

2                     The parties agreed that the outcome of this appeal turns solely upon whether the appeal from Rares J in Tervonen v Minister for Justice and Customs (No 2) [2007] FCA 1684 succeeds.

3                     We have made orders today the effect of which is to allow the appeal from Rares J: see Minister for Home Affairs v Tervonen [2008] FCAFC 24.  It follows that we propose to make orders 1 – 4 in the Notice of Appeal filed on 21 December 2007, as follows: 

(1)        The appeal be allowed.

(2)        Orders 1, 2 and 3 made by Gyles J on 20 December 2007 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the matter be remitted to his Honour to be determined according to law.

(3)        The first respondent be arrested pursuant to s 21(6)(e) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth).

(4)        The first respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.

 

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Court.


Associate:

Date:           6 March 2008


Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr R Beech-Jones SC with Ms K Morgan

 

 

Solicitor for the Appellant:

Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

 

 

Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr D Ash

 

 

Date of Hearing:

15 February 2008

 

 

Date of Judgment:

6 March 2008