FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Johnston v Vintage Developments Pty Limited (ACN 067 567 006)
[2006] FCAFC 171
CORRIGENDUM
GRANT HEATON JOHNSTON v VINTAGE DEVELOPMENTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 067 567 006) AND ANOR)
NSD 915 OF 2006
TAMBERLIN, JACOBSON AND RARES JJ
28 NOVEMBER 2006 (CORRIGENDUM 1 DECEMBER 2006)
SYDNEY
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY |
NSD 915 OF 2006 |
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
BETWEEN: |
GRANT HEATON JOHNSTON Applicant/Appellant
|
|
AND: |
VINTAGE DEVELOPMENTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 067 567 006) First Respondent
ERROL INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 183 277) Second Respondent
|
|
TAMBERLIN, JACOBSON AND RARES JJ |
|
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
28 NOVEMBER 2006 |
|
WHERE MADE: |
SYDNEY |
CORRIGENDUM
1. In paragraph [34] the words ‘ought to have ordered’ should be replaced with ‘ought to have been asked to order’.
2. In the appearances section of the judgment:
(a) ‘Baker & McKenzie’ should read ‘Shand & Associates’;
(b) ‘Shand & Associates’ should read ‘Baker & McKenzie’; and
(c) ‘Mr P R L Lancaster’ should read ‘Mr R P L Lancaster’.
|
I certify that the preceding two (2) paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Tamberlin, Jacobson and Rares. |
Associate:
Dated: 7 December 2006
