FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

State of Western Australia v Ward [2003] FCAFC 124

 


THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6293 OF 1998

 

CROSSWALK PTY LTD & ANOR v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6292 OF 1998

 

ALLIGATOR AIRWAYS PTY LTD v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6294 OF 1998

 

ARGYLE DIAMOND MINES PTY LTD & ORS v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6295 OF 1998

 

ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE NORTHERN TERRITORY v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6296 OF 1998

 

CECIL NINGAMARRA & ORS v NORTHERN TERRITORY

W 6020 OF 1999

 

 

 

 

 

NORTH J

MELBOURNE

3 JUNE 2003



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY

 

 

On Remitter from the High Court in P59 of 2000; P62 of 2000; P63 of 2000 and P67 of 2000.

 

No. WG 6293 of 1998

BETWEEN:

THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Appellants

and

BEN WARD, JOHN TOBY, JIMMY WARD, RONNY CARLTON, JEFF JANAMA, BUTTON JONES, BEN BARNEY, DODGER CARLTON, KIM ALDUS, MURPHY SIMON, SHEBA DIGNARI, JOE LISSADELL, CHOCOLATE THOMAS, and PETER NEWRY

ON BEHALF OF THE MIRIUWUNG AND GAJERRONG PEOPLE

First Respondents

and

CECIL NINGARMARA, DOUGLAS BOOMBI, STEPHANIE BOOMBI, ALICE BOOMBI, SANDRA BOOMBI, RITA BOOMBI, HELEN BOOMBI, ROSIE GALLAGHER, DAVID LUAMI, PETER NEWRY, TOM BARNEY, PATRICK BITTANG, BINGLE GUNDARI, CARLTON GEORGE, RODNEY WALMAJA, GREGORY CALWAT, HERBERT ANTHONY, CHARLIE BARNEY, STAN LONG, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, JOCK McDONALD, and DIANNE DINGAL

Second Respondents

and

DELORES CHEINMORA, MATTENMORO (MARTIN CLARK), VERNON GERARD, DUDLEY BAMBRA, ELAINE JOHNSTONE, ERIC JOHNSTONE, CLARA (LEARAY) MITCHELL, MARY TERESA (TAYLOR), MAY SMITH, MONA WILLIAMS, RAYMOND WILLIAMS, JAMES TAYLOR, VICTOR MARTIN, HECTOR UNHANGO, MANUELLA PURWAN, MARY PANDILOW, KENNY MORGAN, JOYCE EVANS, and ROY MARTIN

ON BEHALF OF THE BALANGARRA PEOPLES

Third Respondents

and

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Intervener

No. WG 6292 of 1998

BETWEEN:

CROSSWALK PTY LTD AND BAINES RIVER CATTLE CO PTY LTD

Appellants

and

BEN WARD, JOHN TOBY, JIMMY WARD, RONNY CARLTON, JEFF JANAMA, BUTTON JONES, BEN BARNEY, DODGER CARLTON, KIM ALDUS, MURPHY SIMON, SHEBA DIGNARI, JOE LISSADELL, CHOCOLATE THOMAS, and PETER NEWRY

ON BEHALF OF THE MIRIUWUNG AND GAJERRONG PEOPLE

First Respondents

and

CECIL NINGARMARA, DOUGLAS BOOMBI, STEPHANIE BOOMBI, ALICE BOOMBI, SANDRA BOOMBI, RITA BOOMBI, HELEN BOOMBI, ROSIE GALLAGHER, DAVID LUAMI, PETER NEWRY, TOM BARNEY, PATRICK BITTANG, BINGLE GUNDARI, CARLTON GEORGE, RODNEY WALMAJA, GREGORY CALWAT, HERBERT ANTHONY, CHARLIE BARNEY, STAN LONG, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, JOCK McDONALD, and DIANNE DINGAL

Second Respondents

No. WG 6294 of 1998

BETWEEN:

ALLIGATOR AIRWAYS PTY LTD, PETER LAURENCE ALVIN, OASIS FARMS, C A & T BRADLEY, W R & A J BROGMUS, J A CARATI, L & M CONLEY, T & E CROOT, C W CURTIS, MAURICE DAVIDSON, DALENE N DAVIES, UTE & HANS DIEDRICKSON, C C & P M DONE, IAN & COLLEEN DUPE, KIMBERLEY NATIVE SEEDS, J ELLETT, B M & J FAIRCLOUGH, STEVE FARQUHAR, JOHN FILE, H G GARDINER T/AS UPSTREAM ORD BANANAS, JEFF GOODING & G HARDING T/AS GOLDEN FRUITS, DOUG G & E M GRANDISON, GUERINONI NOMINEES PTY LTD, NOEL A & AILEEN M HACKETT, ROY & ROSALIE HAMILTON T/AS R & R PLANTATION, WARRAMINGA PTY LTD, STEVE & CHRYSTABELLE HOWELL T/AS SPEEDY & BOB'S ELECTRICS, MICHAEL & HEATHER HOWELL, HOWARD & LESLEY JAMES, GRAHAM JOHN & SHEILA WEBSTER, KIM G JOHNSON T/AS ITCHY PALM PLANTATION, G T KING & D P GAEBLER, J & P KIRBY, LAKE ARGYLE CRUISES, LAKE ARGYLE INDUSTRIES PTY LTD, PATRICIA LAMOREAUX, ANTHONY & JULIE LARSEN, J & J LEACH PARTNERSHIP T/AS WILF ORD-RIVER PLANTATION, C R & S A LEAVER T/AS DELESTION RANGE ESTATE, B LERCH & D SPACKMAN T/AS BARDENA FARMS PTY LTD, PETER AND BELINDA LETCHFORD, ROBIN & SHANE MACKAY, SUZANNE MACKAY, DIELRO PTY LTD, SHARAL PLANTATION, STEPHEN MASSEY & JULIE KEMP, SHANE & SUZANNE MOORE, CRAIG & GAIL MUIR, J L & D G NICHOLSON, DAVID OGILVIE, IAN OLIVER, ORD RIVER DISTRICT CO-OP LTD, ADUR PTY LTD T/AS PARKER POYNT PLANTATION, LYNDON & KAREN PARKER T/AS KARLYN PLANATION, IAN H & ALMA V PETHERICK, RONALD M PORTER, CHRIS & DIANE ROBINSON T/AS ORIA ORCHARDS, R & J V SCHOEPPNER, S C & P M SHARPE, BETHEL INCORPORATED, KENNETH G SKERMAN & HILARY E BRETT, KERRY SLINGSBY, P J E & L A SMITH, ALAN J & JANET A STENNETT, DAVID THORNEYCROFT, JENNIFER TOMKIN, WAYNE R & JANICE A TREMBATH, GREG AND JANE HARMAN, FOLLE INVESTMENTS, HELGA WEISS, MERV & TERESA WELSH T/AS FORESHORE FRUITS, TIMOTHY B & LYNETTE J WESTWOOD T/AS EMELS ORCHARD, G S TURNER & Y M WHITEHEAD T/AS GARVON PLANTATION, ALAN & SUE WILSON, ROD WILSON, WILLIAM R & J M WITHERS, J L & S WOODHEAD, GREG WYNN, JENNY RYMER, CALYTRIX INVESTMENTS PTY LTD, JOHN W READ, STJEPAN VUK, HOWARD YOUNG, J L WOODHEAD, J S W HOLDINGS PTY LTD, EAST KIMBERLEY SPORTS FISHING CLUB, KUNUNURRA RACE CLUB, and KUNUNURRA WATER-SKI CLUB

Appellants

and

BEN WARD, JOHN TOBY, JIMMY WARD, RONNY CARLTON, JEFF JANAMA, BUTTON JONES, BEN BARNEY, DODGER CARLTON, KIM ALDUS, MURPHY SIMON, SHEBA DIGNARI, JOE LISSADELL, CHOCOLATE THOMAS, and PETER NEWRY

ON BEHALF OF THE MIRIUWUNG AND GAJERRONG PEOPLE

First Respondents

and

CECIL NINGARMARA, DOUGLAS BOOMBI, STEPHANIE BOOMBI, ALICE BOOMBI, SANDRA BOOMBI, RITA BOOMBI, HELEN BOOMBI, ROSIE GALLAGHER, DAVID LUAMI, PETER NEWRY, TOM BARNEY, PATRICK BITTANG, BINGLE GUNDARI, CARLTON GEORGE, RODNEY WALMAJA, GREGORY CALWAT, HERBERT ANTHONY, CHARLIE BARNEY, STAN LONG, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, JOCK McDONALD,and DIANNE DINGAL

Second Respondents

 

 

 

 

No. WG 6295 of 1998

BETWEEN:

ARGYLE DIAMOND MINES PTY LTD AND THE ARGYLE DIAMOND MINE JOINT VENTURE

Appellants

and

BEN WARD, JOHN TOBY, JIMMY WARD, RONNY CARLTON, JEFF JANAMA, BUTTON JONES, BEN BARNEY, DODGER CARLTON, KIM ALDUS, MURPHY SIMON, SHEBA DIGNARI, JOE LISSADELL, CHOCOLATE THOMAS, and PETER NEWRY

ON BEHALF OF THE MIRIUWUNG AND GAJERRONG PEOPLE

First Respondents

and

CECIL NINGARMARA, DOUGLAS BOOMBI, STEPHANIE BOOMBI, ALICE BOOMBI, SANDRA BOOMBI, RITA BOOMBI, HELEN BOOMBI, ROSIE GALLAGHER, DAVID LUAMI, PETER NEWRY, TOM BARNEY, PATRICK BITTANG, BINGLE GUNDARI, CARLTON GEORGE, RODNEY WALMAJA, GREGORY CALWAT, HERBERT ANTHONY, CHARLIE BARNEY, STAN LONG, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, JOCK McDONALD, and DIANNE DINGAL

Second Respondents

and

DELORES CHEINMORA, MATTENMORO (MARTIN CLARK), VERNON GERARD, DUDLEY BAMBRA, ELAINE JOHNSTONE, ERIC JOHNSTONE, CLARA (LEARAY) MITCHELL, MARY TERESA (TAYLOR), MAY SMITH, MONA WILLIAMS, RAYMOND WILLIAMS, JAMES TAYLOR, VICTOR MARTIN, HECTOR UNHANGO, MANUELLA PURWAN, MARY PANDILOW, KENNY MORGAN, JOYCE EVANS, and ROY MARTIN

ON BEHALF OF THE BALANGARRA PEOPLES

Third Respondents

and

THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Fourth Respondent

 

 

 

No. WG 6296 of 1998

BETWEEN:

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY and CONSERVATION LAND CORPORATION

Appellants

and

BEN WARD, JOHN TOBY, JIMMY WARD, RONNY CARLTON, JEFF JANAMA, BUTTON JONES, BEN BARNEY, DODGER CARLTON, KIM ALDUS, MURPHY SIMON, SHEBA DIGNARI, JOE LISSADELL, CHOCOLATE THOMAS, and PETER NEWRY

ON BEHALF OF THE MIRIUWUNG AND GAJERRONG PEOPLE

First Respondents

and

CECIL NINGARMARA, DOUGLAS BOOMBI, STEPHANIE BOOMBI, ALICE BOOMBI, SANDRA BOOMBI, RITA BOOMBI, HELEN BOOMBI, ROSIE GALLAGHER, DAVID LUAMI, PETER NEWRY, TOM BARNEY, PATRICK BITTANG, BINGLE GUNDARI, CARLTON GEORGE, RODNEY WALMAJA, GREGORY CALWAT, HERBERT ANTHONY, CHARLIE BARNEY, STAN LONG, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, JOCK McDONALD, and DIANNE DINGAL

Second Respondents

and

DELORES CHEINMORA, MATTENMORO (MARTIN CLARK), VERNON GERARD, DUDLEY BAMBRA, ELAINE JOHNSTONE, ERIC JOHNSTONE, CLARA (LEARAY) MITCHELL, MARY TERESA (TAYLOR), MAY SMITH, MONA WILLIAMS, RAYMOND WILLIAMS, JAMES TAYLOR, VICTOR MARTIN, HECTOR UNHANGO, MANUELLA PURWAN, MARY PANDILOW, KENNY MORGAN, JOYCE EVANS, and ROY MARTIN

ON BEHALF OF THE BALANGARRA PEOPLES

Third Respondents

and

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Intervener

 

 

 

No. W 6020 of 1999

BETWEEN:

CECIL NINGARMARA, DOUGLAS BOOMBI, STEPHANIE BOOMBI, ALICE BOOMBI, SANDRA BOOMBI, RITA BOOMBI, HELEN BOOMBI, ROSIE GALLAGHER, DAVID LUAMI, PETER NEWRY, TOM BARNEY, PATRICK BITTANG, BINGLE GUNDARI, CARLTON GEORGE, RODNEY WALMAJA, GREGORY CALWAT, HERBERT ANTHONY, CHARLIE BARNEY, STAN LONG, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, JOCK McDONALD, and DIANNE DINGAL

Appellants

and

THE NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA

First Respondent

and

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Second Respondent

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

3 JUNE 2003

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

 

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

 

                        DEFINE THE ISSUES

1.                  Each appellant file and serve by 13 June 2003 a notice identifying the grounds, or amended grounds, of appeal it seeks to pursue on the remitter.

2.                  Each respondent file and serve by 27 June 2003 a notice identifying any cross-appeal or contention it seeks to pursue on the remitter.

3.                  Applications for leave to amend a notice of appeal, cross appeal or contention or to file a notice of appeal, cross appeal or contention out of time pursuant to Order 15 Rule (2), Order 21 Rule (3) or Order 22 Rule (1) of the Federal Court Rules, will be heard on 31 July 2003.


            REFERRAL TO MEDIATION

4.                  In so far as it relates to land and waters in Western Australia the matter is referred to mediation by Deputy District Registrar Efthim.  The mediation is listed for 5 days commencing on 23 June 2003 and is to take place in Perth.

5.                  The Registrar is to report to the Court on the outcome of the mediation referred to in Order 4 by 28 July 2003.


NORTHERN TERRITORY

6.         In so far as it relates to land and waters in Northern Territory the matter is referred to mediation by Deputy District Registrar Efthim.  The mediation is listed for 2 days on 18 and 19 June 2003 and is to take place in Darwin.

7.                  The Registrar is to report to the Court on the outcome of the mediation referred to in Order 6 by 28 July 2003.


Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

VICTORIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY

 

 

On Remitter from the High Court in P59 of 2000; P62 of 2000; P63 of 2000 and P67 of 2000.

 

BETWEEN:

 

THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6293 OF 1998

 

CROSSWALK PTY LTD & ANOR v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6292 OF 1998

 

ALLIGATOR AIRWAYS PTY LTD v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6294 OF 1998

 

ARGYLE DIAMOND MINES PTY LTD & ORS v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6295 OF 1998

 

ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE NORTHERN TERRITORY v BEN WARD & ORS

WAG 6296 OF 1998

 

CECIL NINGAMARRA & ORS v NORTHERN TERRITORY

W 6020 OF 1999

 

 

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

3 JUNE 2003

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1                     These appeals have been the subject of a number of directions hearings.  It is not presently necessary to outline this past history in detail.  It is sufficient to say that at a directions hearing held on 14 March 2003, it was ordered that the appeals would be heard in the week commencing 1 September 2003.  The native title claimants were ordered to file and serve a full outline of their submissions by 24 March 2003, in order to crystallize the issues remaining to be determined on remitter from the High Court at the hearing of the appeals.  These submissions were filed on 29 April 2003.

2                     A further directions hearing was held before me on 2 May 2003.  Prior to the hearing, proposed orders were circulated between the parties, which indicated that the parties agreed to the steps necessary to be taken before the hearing of the appeals but disagreed as to some dates.

3                     At the directions hearing I raised the possibility of mediation, which had not been provided for in the proposed orders. There was a good measure of acceptance of this suggestion and it was agreed to include this stage in the timetable.

4                     Having regard to the number of agreed steps necessary to be taken before the hearing of the appeal, it became clear that the September hearing date could not be met.  Most of the parties were content with moving the hearing date to December 2003 as proposed by the claimants of the West Australian lands.  However, as the appeal bench was not available for a December hearing, the hearing of the appeal was tentatively shifted to March 2004. 

5                     I was then persuaded that it was appropriate to list the appeals relating to the Northern Territory lands for hearing at an earlier date than the appeals relating to the Western Australian lands.  This was because the issues relating to the Northern Territory lands appeared much more confined.  Indeed, I was told that agreement had been reached in relation to the Northern Territory lands, subject to the resolution of some issues raised by the Commonwealth, and subject to consultation with the native title claimants of the Western Australian lands. 

6                     At the conclusion of the directions hearing on 2 May 2003, I directed that the parties prepare minutes of orders based on the general framework of the steps to be taken, as discussed, and the timing of those steps.

7                     However, despite valiant efforts, no agreement as to dates could be reached.  The parties were then directed to file submissions on that issue and I prepared draft orders based on these submissions.  Prior to advising the parties of the dates fixed in the orders, however, the Court was informed that Beaumont J had taken ill and was to undergo urgent surgery.  He is now on the road to recovery, but is unable to continue as a member of this Full Court.  On Friday, 30 May 2003, the Chief Justice reconstituted the bench, adding Wilcox and Weinberg JJ as members of the Full Court. 

8                     In light of the unfortunate and unforeseen events that have occurred, a new timetable must be settled within the framework established on 2 May 2003, and which accommodates the availability of the appeal bench.  The timetable is based upon the draft orders filed by the State of Western Australia prior to the 2 May 2003 directions hearing, which provided as follows:

9                     DEFINE THE ISSUES

1.                  Each appellant file and serve by ……. a notice identifying the grounds, or amended grounds, of appeal it seeks to pursue on the remitter.

2.                  Each respondent file and serve by ……. a notice identifying any cross-appeal or contention it seeks to pursue on the remitter.

3.                  Applications for leave to amend a notice of appeal, cross appeal or contention or to file a notice of appeal, cross appeal or contention out of time pursuant to Order 15 Rule (2), Order 21 Rule (3) or Order 22 Rule (1) of the Federal Court Rules, will be heard on ……. .


REFERRAL TO MEDIATION

4.                  In so far as it relates to land and waters in Western Australia the matter is referred to mediation by Deputy District Registrar Efthim.  The mediation is listed for 5 days commencing on ……. . The mediation is to take place in Perth.

5.                  The Registrar is to report to the Court on the outcome of the mediation referred to in Order 4 by ……. .


NORTHERN TERRITORY

6.                  In so far as it relates to land and waters in Northern Territory the matter is referred to mediation by Deputy District Registrar Efthim.  The mediation is listed for 2 days on ……. The mediation is to take place in Darwin.

7.                  The Registrar is to report to the Court on the outcome of the mediation referred to in Order 6 by ……. .


NOTICE OF FURTHER EVIDENCE

8.                  Any Party wishing to do so shall file and serve by ……. an application for an order pursuant to s 27 of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) that the Court receive further evidence, together with:

(a)       in relation to any evidence proposed to be led orally – notice of the substance of that proposed evidence;

(b)       in relation to any other evidence – a statement, affidavit or document containing or comprising that proposed evidence.

9.                  Any application made pursuant to order 8 is fixed for hearing on ……. .


HEARING OF ANY FURTHER EVIDENCE

10.       The week commencing ……. be fixed for the hearing of any further evidence.


WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS AND REPLIES

Western Australia

11.       In so far as they relate to the issues concerning land and waters in Western Australia:

(a)               each appellant and any intervenor file and serve by ……. full written submissions;

(b)              each respondent file and serve by ……. full written submissions; and

(c)               each appellant and any intervenor file and serve by ……. full written replies.


Northern Territory

12.       In so far as they relate to the issues concerning land and waters in the Northern Territory:

(a)               each appellant file and serve by ……. full written submissions;

(b)              each respondent and any intervenor file and serve by ……. full written submissions; and

(c)               each appellant file and serve by ……. full written replies.


HEARING

Western Australia

13.              In so far as it relates to the issues concerning land and waters in Western Australia the hearing of the remitted appeals is to take place in Perth in ……. before the Full Court. 


Northern Territory

14.              In so far as it relates to the issues concerning land and waters in the Northern Territory the hearing of the remitted appeals is to take place in Darwin in the week commencing ……. before the Full Court.


APPEAL PAPERS

15.              The following documents shall stand as the appeal books:

(a)       the set of original exhibits tendered at trial which will be shared by the members of the Full Court;

(b)       the Joint Appeal Book comprising 3 volumes used at the hearing of the original appeals and an additional volume or volumes containing the reasons for decision of the High Court, the Orders of the High Court and any other material as directed by the Registrar;

(c)       the CD-rom of the uncorrected transcript which was used at the hearing of the original appeals;

(d)       the 27 volumes entitled “Exhibits to which Appellants may Refer” used in the original appeals;

(d)              additional volumes entitled “Additional Appeal Material on Remitter” prepared in accordance with Orders 17, 18 and 19 which volumes shall include the transcript of any further evidence and exhibits received in accordance with these Orders.

16.              By ……. each party making submissions in respect of the issues concerning the land and waters in Northern Territory serve on each other party a notice indicating which documents in the original hearing not already listed in the set of documents entitled “Exhibits to which Appellants may Refer” that may be referred to in the course of oral submissions to be made in the week commencing ……. .

17.              By ……. the Registrar is to hold a conference at which the index of the additional volume(s) of the appeal books is to be settled.

18.              By ……. the State shall file 4 copies of the Joint Appeal Book and 27 volumes referred to in Order 15(b) and (d);

19.              By ……. the State shall prepare, file and serve the additional volumes referred to in Order 15(c).

20.              Service of the documents referred to in Order 15(c) and (d) is dispensed with.

21.              By ……. the Northern Territory is to:

(a)        prepare and file 4 copies of volumes entitled “Exhibits to which Parties may refer at hearing in …….” which contain those documents which notice was given pursuant to Order 16; and

(b)        serve an index to the documents contained in the volumes prepared and filed in accordance with Order 21(a).

22.              By ……. each party making submissions in respect of the issues concerning the land and waters in Western Australia serve on each other such party a notice indicating which documents in the original hearing (not already listed in the set of documents entitled “Exhibits to which Appellant may Refer”) will be referred to in the course of oral submissions to be made in the week commencing ……. .

23.              By ……. the State is to:

(a)        prepare and file 4 copies of volumes entitled “Exhibits to which Parties may refer at hearing in …….” which contain those documents of which notice was given pursuant to Order 22; and

(b)       serve an index of the documents contained in the volumes prepared and filed in accordance with Order 23(a).


FURTHER ORDERS

24.              The Orders made by Lee J in proceeding WAG 6001 of 1995 restricting access to certain passages of transcript and certain exhibits to certain persons of a particular gender, be varied so as to allow legal representatives of the same gender and now representing a party to have access to that material.

25.              Orders 1(b), 2 and 3 made 14 March 2003 be vacated.

26.              The matter is listed for a further directions hearing on ……. .

27.              Liberty to any party to apply.


10                  I intend to make orders in the form of 1 to 7 in the above draft immediately in order that the steps referred to therein can be undertaken in the near future.  The dates to be inserted in the draft order are as follows:

Order 1 – 13 June 2003;

Order 2 – 27 June 2003;

Order 3 – 31 July 2003;

Order 4 – 23 June 2003;

Order 5 – 28 July 2003;

Order 6 – 18 and 19 June 2003;

Order 7 – 28 July 2003.


11                  As to the remaining orders, I indicate that the appeal bench is available to hear any contested application to amend the notice of appeal, cross-appeal, or contentions, or any application to lead further evidence on 31 July 2003.  The Court is also available to hear any further evidence, and the Northern Territory appeal, in the week commencing 29 September 2003.  The Court is also available to hear the substance of the appeal in relation to the West Australian lands in either November 2003 or February 2004. 

12                  If any party has a strong objection to any of these dates that party should indicate that objection and the reasons for it by a submission in writing to be filed and served by 10 June 2003.  The dates have been selected by reference to the availability of the three new members of the Court, and with reference to the already indicated availability of the parties.  Obviously, with so many parties it is not possible to please all of the parties all of the time.  Given the history of the application, it is important to restrict any objections to problems that are sufficiently serious to warrant revisiting the setting of dates. Once the date of hearing the appeals is fixed, the times for filing submissions, and for taking other preparatory steps, will be determined.



I certify that the preceding twelve (12) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North .



Associate:


Dated:              3 June 2003


Matter No. WAG 6293 OF 1998


Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr Ken Pettit SC



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Crown Solicitor’s Office, Western Australia



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr Robert Blowes



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr Ron Levy



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Northern Land Council



Counsel for the Third Respondent:

Mr Walter Sofronoff QC



Solicitor for the Third Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Intervener:

Mr Jeremy Allanson



Solicitor for the Intervener:

Australian Government Solicitors




Matter No. WAG 6292 OF 1998



Counsel for the Appellants:

Mr Marshall McKenna



Solicitor for the Appellants:

Hunt & Humphrey



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr Robert Blowes



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr Ron Levy



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Northern Land Council

 

Matter No. WAG 6294 OF 1998

 


Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr P L Wittkuhn



Solicitor for the Appellant:

McCleod & Co. Solicitors



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr Robert Blowes



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr Ron Levy



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Northern Land Council



Counsel for the Third Respondent:

Mr Walter Sofronoff QC



Solicitor for the Third Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Matter No. WAG 6295 OF 1998

 


Counsel for the Appellant:

Ms Helen Kurz



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Freehills



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr Robert Blowes



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr Ron Levy



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Northern Land Council



Counsel for the Third Respondent:

Mr Walter Sofronoff QC



Solicitor for the Third Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Fourth Respondent:

Mr Ken Pettit SC



Solicitor for the Fourth Respondent:

Crown Solicitor’s Office, Western Australia


Matter No. WAG 6296 OF 1998



Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr Tom Pauling QC



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Solicitor General for the Northern Territory



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr Robert Blowes



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr Ron Levy



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Northern Land Council



Counsel for the Third Respondent:

Mr Walter Sofronoff QC



Solicitor for the Third Respondent:

Kimberley Land Council



Counsel for the Intervener:

Mr Jeremy Allanson



Solicitor for the Intervener:

Australian Government Solicitor



Matter No. W 6020 OF 1999

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr Ron Levy



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Northern Land Council



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr Tom Pauling QC



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Solicitor General for the Northern Territory



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr Ken Pettit SC



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Crown Solicitor’s Office



 


Date of Hearing:

2 May 2003



Date of Judgment:

3 June 2003