FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2002] FCAFC 228

NAAV v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

N 265 of 2002

NABE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

N 282 of 2002

ANARE SUA RATUMAIWAI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

N 399 of 2002

AUREL TURCAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

V 225 of 2002

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS v JIAN ZHONG WANG

S 84 of 2002

BLACK CJ, BEAUMONT, WILCOX, FRENCH and von DOUSSA JJ

15 AUGUST 2002 (CORRIGENDUM 10 SEPTEMBER 2002)

MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN	NAAV N 265 OF 2002 APPELLANT
AND	MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS FIRST RESPONDENT THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SECOND RESPONDENT
BETWEEN	NABE N 282 OF 2002 APPELLANT
AND	MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENT
BETWEEN	ANARE SUA RATUMAIWAI N 399 OF 2002 APPELLANT
AND	MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENT
BETWEEN	AUREL TURCAN V 225 OF 2002 APPELLANT
AND	MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENT
BETWEEN	S 84 OF 2002 MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS APPELLANT
AND	JIAN ZHONG WANG RESPONDENT
JUDGES:	BLACK CJ, BEAUMONT, WILCOX, FRENCH and von DOUSSA JJ
DATE:	15 AUGUST 2002
PLACE:	MELBOURNE

CORRIGENDUM

(1) On the cover sheet, remove “Country Roads”.

(2) In paragraph 461 and on the cover sheet, “Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 170” should read “Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510”.

(3) In paragraph 471 and on the cover sheet, “Timbarri Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55” should read “Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55.

(4) In the last sentence of paragraph 499 “objected to particular stringency” should read “subjected to particular stringency”.

Emily Hammond

Associate

10 September 2002

Top